Sunday 25 January 2015

Advance Australia unfair: Je suis les refugees du Manus

Advance Australia unfair: Je suis les refugees du Manus



216 8



(Image via @lucyham)


Australia's treatment of refugees on Manus Island has
disturbing similarities to the treatment of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi
Germany before World War II says Lyn Bender, whose parents fled Poland
before the War.




As Tony Abbott praises the great work of guards in riot gear rushing in to control helpless refugees imprisoned in a compound, the suffering, attempted hangings, swallowing of razor blades, thirst and hunger continues at Manus. I ask myself: what have we all become?



My father was a refugee. So was my mother.



Is it this fact that prompts me to ask why are we not all horrified
at the cruelty and abuse of our refugee “policy”? How can a government
that thinks like a reincarnated Nazi machine, get away with such
brutality? How can they refuse to disclose the true story while
professing to champion free speech?




Drawing comparisons between Australia’s offshore detention centres and the Nazi concentration camps is usually slammed as over the top and as a travesty.



Yet Thomas Keneally, author of Schindlers Ark, in 2004 compared Australia’s detention centres to concentration camps.





They have not improved since.



How do we dare to compare our civilised government with that
atrocity? Easily. For starters, refugees have been imprisoned
indefinitely in sub-standard camps
and without trial, merely for seeking our help The plight of the
refugees on Manus is easily as horrendous as the plight of the Jews
trying to flee Nazi persecution in the nineteen thirties. My father was a
refugee and so was my mother and her family. I would not have been
born, had they not been allowed to live in Australia.




My parents did not arrive on small boats; but on ocean liners. To be
allowed to come to Australia, you needed sponsorship from an Australian
citizen. Sponsorship was hard to get. Many friends and family remained
behind in Poland. My paternal grandparents, aunts, uncles and their
children were slaughtered when the Nazis invaded Poland. With such a
family background, it is not surprising that I feel an emotional
connection to the plight of asylum seekers on Manus Island. But it took
me a while to recognise that the parallels were deeply connected.




Historian Professor Bernard Wasserstein has revealed
the commonality of the attitudes towards the plight of Jewish refugees
in World War II and towards today’s asylum seekers. He cites all too
familiar terminology in his scholarly work; Gertrude Tijn and the fate of the Dutch Jews.




They were called "queue jumpers" and "economic migrants" and some were sent back to Germany.
Others were granted temporary settlement, while some drowned during
desperate journeys on unseaworthy ships. Despite the awareness of the
danger that the refugees faced, strict quotas were applied. Britain
accepted only 65,000, Holland 30,000 and the United States 150,000.
Wasserstein attributes the reluctance to welcome refugees as due to
xenophobia, anti-Semitism and fear of refugees being an economic impost.
Sound familiar?






The Evian Conference was
convened by the U.S. in 1938 to discuss the issue of increasing numbers
of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi persecution — the "refugee problem".




At that conference, Australian delegate Thomas White stated about this country:



"It will no doubt be appreciated also that as we have no real
racial problem, we are not desirous of importing one by encouraging any
scheme of large-scale foreign migration …"





All this has a familiar ring in today’s Australia.



Collective guilt at the fate of Europe’s Jews may have driven the establishment of the 1951 Refugee Convention.
This grants the right of those fearing persecution to seek asylum. They
have the right not to be returned to danger. The importance of this Convention to Australia’s treatment of refugees is at least threefold:




  • Those fleeing danger have a legal right to seek asylum and this right should be honoured.
  • Asylum seekers should not be punished for seeking asylum.
  • They should not be returned to danger.
On all three counts, Australia, as a signatory to the Convention, scores a big fail.



So how bad is life on Manus? At least as bad as the conditions that I observed while working at Woomera Detention Centre in 2002.
Hunger strikes, sewn lips, suicide attempts, the last resort of the
powerless, were and still are featured daily. In a twisted form of
remembrance, the compound names are even the same: Oscar, Foxtrot, Mike
and Delta. The compounds have names, but detainees are given numbers.
Children become extremely depressed. The remoteness is meant to
discourage media scrutiny and accountability, but the truth emerged at
Woomera — just as the truth about Manus is also emerging.




The Liberal Party is singing in unison the chorus of “no compassion
here”. For a Government that professes to champion free speech, that
right is not being granted to refugees.






A member of the recently disbanded Immigration Health Advisory Group, psychologist Amanda Gordon, contends that refugees are using their bodies to express protest.



She says:



“For some it is a break down of mental health; but for others it
is in fact a sign of resilience. The sewn lips illustrate that no one is
listening and that they have no voice.




"Do you lie there and do nothing or do you make a statement?....
Don’t just treat me as a voiceless person …. If I had murdered someone I
would have a right to a voice. The hunger strike is an expression of
utter hopelessness”





Yet Foreign Minister Julie Bishop – with customary sang froiddeclares:



“It is a volatile situation because these people clearly don't
want to accept the safe haven that's being offered to them. However this
kind of behavior will not be rewarded with a visa to Australia.”





Safe haven! She has got to be in satire mode.



Peter Dutton has admonished
the desperate on Manus as though they were misbehaving children, saying
they will never be settled in Australia. Just as was done with
“resettlement” of Jewish refugees, Dutton will be scurrying off to
overburdened Cambodia to finalize an agreement to dump Australia’s
refugee problem on another poor country.




It seems, from footage, that the current protestors are calling for freedom.





There are reported fears of forced “resettlement” in a hostile PNG. After the murder of Reza Berarti, you could argue that they have a well-founded fear.



We are now the persecutors. Both side of politics have shamelessly played with the lives of traumatised men women and children.



The irony is that Australia has prospered and thrived with its influx
of pre and post war refugees. Without the enrichment brought by the
European, middle eastern and Asian migrant culture, where would we all
be? Stuck in a flag draped, bigoted, White Australia, Groundhog Day in
Abbottland 




Happy Australia Day, but not for those unfortunate enough to seek our protection. Advance Australia unfair.



You can follow Lyn Bender on Twitter @Lynestel. And please support IA by making a donation.

Thursday 22 January 2015

Life imitating art - The AIM Network

Life imitating art - The AIM Network




Life imitating art










The scenes of social collapse in movies of a decade ago are now everyday scenes in allegedly democratic countries, writes Melissa Frost in this letter to The AIMN.

I watched the movie “Children of Men” again the other night and
walked away with a renewed feeling of dread. A sinking feeling of doom
came over me. Right in my chest. Had I just witnessed a glimpse of the
future? Our future. Our future here on Earth. Was this how it ends? Are
we imploding as a species? “No, no, no”, I said to myself. It can’t be,
as I slipped onto the comfort of my massive mattress pulling the crisp
European duvet over my head. But as I restlessly tossed around in bed
that night I started to analyse what is happening here in Australia.


There are a lot of similarities between the movie and the ideology of
our present government in Australia. We have a government that is
anti-immigration, totalitarian and fascist. Refugees coming to our
shores are classified as illegal immigrants, hunted down by our border
patrols, made to sit on navy decks in neat little rows of confinement
and then transferred to prisons where they spend an eternity of misery.
These scenes we view hourly on the 24hour news channels we also see in
the movie. A universal battleground of military control, security zones,
refugee camps and warring tribal and religious identities.


The world of “Children of Men” is in absolute turmoil and anguish.
The media are filled with headlines about religious fundamentalism –
based terrorist attacks, mosques being put under surveillance,
allegations of tortures of journalists, backlash against refugees and
immigrants and political powerplays enveloped in pollution and poverty.
The scenes of the two hour movie are a world of social collapse and
desperation redolent of the hourly scenes on our screens of Iraq, Syria,
Gaza or closer to home the 105,000 homeless of Australia. Which brings
me to the story of the residents of a luxury apartment block in the UK
installing spikes outside “their” reception area to deter a somewhat
sheltered slumber for the homeless of Southward, South London. Mark Hicks,
a resident of the building, said it was a “very good idea” as he was
seeing “drunk homeless people” in his doorway which is “not very nice at
all and if it stops that, its great”.


Where has our humanity gone? Are we so desensitised to these hourly
visions that our subconsciousness is now immune? Yes, yes I think we
are. “Children of Men” is based in the UK and it is interesting that the
film makers decided on the UK. The UK is one of the oldest democracies
in the world. Democracy means a government by the people. That is all
the people have a say in the running of their lives. So for Brits to
witness their government developing fascist ideologies and
terror-invoking methods is tyrannical and oppressive.


And this is exactly what is happening in Australia. We are witnessing
a government led by Tony Abbott who is backed by conglomerates such as
the Rinehart empire and the Murdoch empire thrusting 24 hour fascist
ideology and terror-invoking commentary on the Australian people. Its
time for Australians to read the signs and demand Democracy.



Wednesday 21 January 2015

Manus bothers me - it should bother you too

Manus bothers me - it should bother you too

Manus bothers me – it should bother you too






The media has been diligently reporting on the Manus Island situation.

The new Minister has castigated the media
for publishing false reports. Yet the Minister has provided no proof
the reports are false.



The underlying issue is not being addressed.

2011: professionals warned that detention is dysfunctional.

2012: Amnesty International wrote a scathing assessment of Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers.

2013: The UN found we were in contravention of over 150 points of international law.

2014: Criticism from every quarter, it seemed.

Here we are in 2015, still marching to our strange inhumane drum.

The situation gets worse, not better. We
“have boundless plains to share” our national anthem says. Not if you
are non-Christian or non-white it seems.

Last year I wrote a little fiction about Australians becoming asylum seekers.
 I’ve asked if New Zealanders suddenly had to flee the shaky isles in
boats after a natural disaster, would they be sent to Manus Island or
Nauru?

What are we doing? The psychological
damage we are causing people is something they may never, ever recover
from. We are responsible. Every single one of us who does not speak out
in defence of the defenceless is responsible.

Read Michael Burge’s interview with refugee advocate George Georgiadis. Read the UNHCR’s Rough Crossing.

Speak out. Today.

Cruelty is the worst policy - The AIM Network

Cruelty is the worst policy - The AIM Network



Cruelty is the worst policy














So much for that quintessential
Australian phrase ‘a fair go for all’. It doesn’t exist in the minds of
our policy makers, writes Jennifer Wilson.



In general, it’s always seemed to me that when governments or
individuals take an increasingly hard, harsh and inhumane stand on an
issue it’s a clear signal that they’ve actually lost the battle, and are
on their way to losing the war.



In a political sense, I’m thinking of the current situation
in detention facilities on Manus Island. New Immigration Minister Peter
Dutton is promising to maintain Scott Morrison’s “hard-line” against
asylum seekers who have resorted to self-harm and protest, methods which
are, in reality, their only means of expression, as the Australian
government has virtually denied them access to legal process and natural
justice.



This hard-line against asylum seekers protesting their fate began in
Woomera and Baxter detention centres in 1999, at the instigation of the
Howard LNP government. It was maintained by the ALP governments led by
Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd. Sixteen years of both major parties taking
a hard-line against waterborne asylum seekers has achieved absolutely
nothing any of us can be proud of, and it won’t.



Similarly, the hard-line threatened by the Abbott government against the young unemployed that
will see them starving and homeless as they are denied benefits for six
months will achieve nothing any of us can be proud of, and will ruin
lives for a very long time and likely permanently.



Taking a hard-line is very rarely necessary, and very rarely useful. A
hard-line shouldn’t be the default position. Instead negotiation,
mediation, conversation, and communication are civilised and humane
methods of approaching difficulties. When all else fails, by all means
try the hard-line, but to do this first is cruel and inhumane, and shows
a lack of intelligence, imagination and skill.



Human beings have a tremendous capacity for good will and
understanding. It’s a great shame our leaders don’t value this capacity,
and instead believe our strength lies in brutality. It doesn’t. It
never has and it never will. ‘All cruelty springs from weakness’, as the
philosopher Seneca noted.



If governments and individuals are too weak and cowardly to sit
across a table from other human beings in an effort to resolve
difference and difficulty, they will inevitably resort to cruelty of one
kind or another. Ignoring another human being in need is just as cruel
as taking direct and punitive action against him or her. There are
countless stories of asylum seekers achieving success and making
considerable contributions to Australian society when they are given the
opportunity. Instead we destroy them because our governments believe
the destruction of human lives and human potential demonstrates
political strength and determination.



Peter Dutton may well congratulate himself for emulating Scott
Morrison’s abhorrent tactics against those legally seeking asylum in
Australia. But emulating a bully is no great achievement. Australian
governments have for sixteen years now proved themselves to be capable
only of bullying behaviour towards human beings in the greatest distress
and need, be they asylum seekers or their own citizens. Cruelty is not a
strength. It is the most appalling, base and destructive weakness.



This article was first published on Jennifer’s blog No Place For Sheep.


Monday 19 January 2015

The inhumanity of Manus

The inhumanity of Manus



374 8





On Manus, there are a 100, 300, 700 men – some of them fathers of children, all of them sons of mothers – thirsting to death.



Some have willed their organs to sick Australians, so some part of them will get here though they, while alive, do not. In punishment for this grand gesture Tony Abbott, an English migrant, is thirsting them to death.



Some of them are what we call "genuine refugees". They have a right
to be here. We are obliged to take them, under a UN convention we signed
sixty years ago. And we are subjecting some of them to capital
punishment, for wanting to come here.




Some of them have wives and children already here. And new Immigration Minister Peter Dutton
has told them, you will never get to Australia, get used to it. You
will never see your children again. Get used to it. You can have the
next 50 years in PNG, never leaving it. Get used to it. If you try to
leave PNG, you will be arrested and imprisoned. For trying to see your
wife and children. That can never be. Get used to it.






A few questions arise here, apart from the obvious one, how dare we?
One is, can their wives and children visit them? Not just in PNG
hereafter, but on Manus, now? Can that visit be conjugal? Why not? Can
they, as PNG citizens, visit Australia? Why not? Can they overstay? If
they do, what happens to them?




Curiously, this coincides with the Je suis Charlie saga. We are Charlie, but these refugees are not. They cannot be heard. We have freedom of speech, but they do not.



Why, exactly?



They are being locked up and thirsted to death because they escaped a
regime, Iran, or Sri Lanka, where some of them were genuinely
persecuted – the ones who are genuine refugees – and they have a right
not to go back there. But they do not have a right to come here. Though
their wives and children, or some of them, did.






This is a crime against humanity so manifest that Dutton, a former
Queensland policeman who will in his time have heard the phrase "death in custody" should be considering his position. If one of these young men dies on his watch, as Reza Berati did on Morrison’s, he should consider his position.




If, however, we no longer believe in the rule of law and we are in a Mugabe-Zimbabwe
kind of nation, of course none of this matters. We can kill whoever we
like. We can let them thirst to death. And harvest their organs, the way the Chinese do with their executed criminals — dead of a single bullet to the back of the head.




What are we coming to? Two years ago, with Bob Carr
as foreign minister, we were admired as a nation — as a liberal,
generous people, whom poorer countries looked up to. Now we are refusing
to pursue and arrest murderers – Berati’s murderers – and thirsting, in
hundreds, or dozens, young men to death.






It may or may not be possible for Premier Palaszczuk’s Attorney-General to report Dutton to the International Criminal Court
for crimes against humanity and put him through the difficulty of
testing in our High Court the constitutionality of his defiance of the
laws of the nations. It may or may not be possible to refuse the donated
organs of a genuine refugees with children here.




Into what a cesspool Morrison, Abbott and Bishop – and, yes, Rudd and Burke – have drawn us.



Will we ever be clean again?



I doubt it.



Saturday 17 January 2015

Are you not human?

Are you not human?





128 0



Illustration courtesy Cathy Wilcox, Fairfax Media


Seventeen year old student, Meg Hill, pleads for a more
compassionate approach to our treatment of refugees, reminding us they
are human just like us.




ON THE morning of January 10th 2014, the 28th Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony John “Tony” Abbott, stated this
in response to a query regarding his refusal to release information on
asylum seekers and boat arrivals to the Australian public:




"In the end we are in a fierce contest with these people
smugglers and if we were at war we wouldn't be giving out information
that is of use to the enemy just because we might have an idle curiosity
about it ourselves." 





Isn't it just slightly hypocritical for someone who constantly
condemned the previous government's policies on asylum seekers as a
means of gaining public support during an election, to pull a cloak of
invisibility over his own government's actions on exactly the same issue
immediately subsequent to his winning office?




Human lives are not some kind of expendable resource on which the
leader of our country can test his power of censorship over the people.






 


It is also slightly concerning that on the 21st of February 2014, the Chinese government expressed their concern over Australia's treatment of refugees.



When Australia – the “lucky country”, supposed leading nation in
terms of freedom, liberty and democracy – is criticised for possible
violations of human rights by a draconian government at the forefront of
human rights abuses, who executes more of its own citizens than any
other country in the world, who censors its internet of the words "human
rights" and "freedom" and who actively tortures people for their
political and religious beliefs, I think we need to take a step back and
have a good look at ourselves. 




But where do we go when this issue is not being afforded a legitimate
choice by the political spectrum that provides the pendulum swing
between a choice of Liberal or Labor governments? The leaders of two
separate, politically opposing governments seem to have discovered
mutual accord on only one policy — the degradation of refugees.




They have branded the word “illegal” across the foreheads of those
seeking asylum hypocritically neglecting to acknowledge the foundations
on which contemporary Australia was built. 











(image courtesy of John Graham


 


Just a few hundred years ago, no white man or woman had ever touched
the tips of their toes on a single speck of the dirt that has
accumulated as the land beneath our feet but concurrently floats freely
as its own entity, from the deserts to the snowy caps, the rainforests
that meet the shoreline, from the canopies to the decaying leaf litter
that will soon turn to dirt, too.




In just the tiny blip of time on the ever expansive face of history
since eleven ships sailed into Botany Bay in 1788, we have seen the
influx of people from every background, every shade in a range of colors
more likened to a galaxy than a spectrum, collectively carrying the
genetic psyche passed down from the founders of every modern
civilization. 




To deny our international siblings entrance now, in their time of
desperation, is not only arbitrary but also completely oppositional to
the diversity that has made our country what it is.








The government seems to have developed an infatuation with the
castigation of refugees, a contagion that infects the media as if the
journalistic immune system of critical thinking and fact checking has
all but withered away.




Among the symptoms is the breaking down of the human race into
subordinate subspecies and the inflation and exaggeration of our current
situation in relation to refugees and asylum seekers. As a result, it
is almost certain you are not aware of the fact that there are thirteen times more illegal immigrants arriving by plane and over-staying their visas than there are legitimate refugees in Australia.




Does this tell us where the real problem and economic wastage lays? Not only this, but the Refugee Council of Australia states
that we do not even make the list for the top ten nations with the
largest number of refugee arrivals. In fact, we are ranked 49th.






Through this misleading creation of a common enemy, in which every
day Australians actually believe that asylum seekers are a formidable
threat to our way of life, a failing system of apathy is kept together
like an engine with no bolts, and we rattle down an unsustainable
highway manipulated by the emphasis we place on the things that tear us
apart instead of the things that pull us together.




The presence of dissimilar superficial features seems to dictate our
opinions of foreigners, like disparity in physical appearance is some
kind of unbreakable boundary that primal human connection cannot
possibly overcome. Our first impressions of another being are
instantaneous identifications of the qualities that make them different
from us.






We prescribe grossly stereotyped labels and repeat them like
hypnotised lab rats, docile and mindless. Don’t let yourself be
hypnotized. Don't be brainwashed into xenophobia. Refugees are not the
enemy; they aren't '”just seeking permanent residency” or coming to
pollute our culture. They're coming because they've got guns aimed at
their heads. Stop ignoring the one thing we have in common: we are all
humans.




Are you not a human being before you are an Anglo-Saxon, Australian-born citizen?



Before you have the privilege of education, health-care, welfare payments, clean water and food?



Before you are lucky enough to not have been born on land ripped apart by war and to not have been driven from that land by a never ceasing state of fear?



Before you weren't forced to hand over your life's wages, a
sum already so measly in the eyes of any Westerner, to a little man with
a crooked smile for a ticket on a rickety, over-crowded boat, to sail
across the mass of the sea just to be intercepted by the navy of a
'free' nation and treated like a criminal. Locked up indefinitely in a
detention center, labeled an “illegal” and tossed away by childish
governments like they would free themselves of an unwanted toy.








To see all of Father Rod Bower's signs, visit Gosford Anglican Church FB.



We are humans and evolving nomads. From one point on the African
continent we travelled and spread until every habitable place on Earth
was settled. We move by default, whether it is the vibration of a
nucleus, a bus route to school or a drive home from work, we are always
moving. It is only when that movement violates our borders that it
becomes restricted, or taboo, or illegal. 




You are a human. We are all humans and we were all born with
empathy, compassion and the ability to help one another. You are a
human firstly, and this comes before everything else. Before you cast
blame. Before you let the government or the media manipulate you with
fear — the fear that a refugee will steal your job, or your home, or
your wife or husband.




They won't corrupt your children, or your culture, or rob you of your
salary. They won't conduct a military coup, overthrow democracy and
install a dictatorship.




Stop letting fictitiously founded fear over-rule the basic decency of the human race, because refugees are humans, too.



You can follow Meg Hill on Twitter at @Megh1997. 



Buy John Graham originals from IA's online store.

Manus Island: violent clashes break out between PNG police and detainees

Manus Island: violent clashes break out between PNG police and detainees



The immigration minister, Peter Dutton, has accused refugee advocates
of coaching asylum seekers to self-harm and of creating a “volatile”
situation on Manus Island, where a mass hunger strike has entered its fourth full day.



After denying a hunger-strike was occurring for two days, Dutton said
on Friday he was very concerned for the welfare of striking detainees,
but alleged they were being “coached” to self-harm by refugee advocates
in Australia and workers on Manus Island.



Late on Friday afternoon, violent clashes broke out between Papua New Guinea police and detainees.


Detainees said several hundred security guards and police had entered
the compounds and fights had broken out as detainees were pushed into
their rooms.





Manus Island fight


Pinterest


Pictures sent to Guardian
Australian on Friday afternoon 16 January show security forces entering
Delta block of the Manus Island detention centre.



“The police and guards attack to us ... it is really bad situation,” a
panicked man said in a message sent to Guardian Australia. The sound of
yelling could be heard in the background.




Advertisement
Earlier,
Dutton said protests by asylum seekers would not change the
government’s resolve and that the detainees would never be moved to
Australia.



“My very clear message today is to people that would seek to
misinform those transferees, that somehow if their behaviour is changed
or that they become noncompliant, that somehow that will result in them
settling in Australia: it will not,” he said.



“That is a very clear, strong and determined message from me as minister. And that will not change.”


Detainees have denied being encouraged to protest or to harm themselves.


“No, never ever. Never,” one detainee told Guardian Australia in response to the minister’s comments. “He’s a liar.”


And refugee advocates have reacted furiously, saying they had spent
the past week urging asylum seekers not to go on hunger strike or commit
acts of self-harm.





manus texts


Pinterest

A record of text messages exchanged between Ben Pynt from Humanitarian Research Partners and a Manus Island detainee.


“I am affronted by this allegation,” said Ben Pynt of advocacy group
Humanitarian Research Partners, “when I have spent the last week trying
to stop people doing this, telling them not to self-harm. The minister
offers no evidence for his accusations. I can show plenty of evidence of
me saying to these men ‘do not do this’, ‘do not hurt yourself’, ‘you
need to live’.”



Pynt sent Guardian Australia transcripts of electronic conversations with detainees on the island.


The latest information from the island suggests
up to 500 men are engaged in a hunger strike that started in Mike
compound on Tuesday but has since spread to other compounds.



At least 20 men have stitched their lips shut in protest. Two men
have swallowed razor blades, while four men drank detergent overnight
Thursday as the protest worsened.






0:00
/
0:00


Pinterest

Video of a man being treated after drinking detergent
was sent to Guardian Australia



Staff on the island have told Guardian Australia the entire detention
centre is on lockdown, meaning no staff are permitted in the compounds
because of a “high security alert”.




Advertisement
Security
teams have judged that it is unsafe for staff to enter. There have been
reports of fights breaking out between guards and protesting detainees.



Non-essential staff have been sent to their accommodation – including
some medical staff removed from the International Health and Medical
Services medical centre – and only emergency patients can get treatment.



Video footage obtained by Guardian Australia shows several
unconscious detainees being taken to the medical centre on stretchers.



Men are falling unconscious at rate of about one every half-hour,
according to detainees. Many can no longer stand or walk, but lie on
blankets on the ground at the wire fence of their compound.



Those who can stand chant “What do we want? Freedom!”


“I don’t want to be dead,” one detainee told Guardian Australia. “I’m
really scared. Every 30 minutes someone faints, but no one is coming to
help us.”



This protest of the last four days follows weeks of increasing
tension on the island and escalating desperation among asylum seekers.



Detainees are protesting the following:



  • The length of time it has taken to process their refugee claims (some have been on the island 18 months with no decision)
  • The conditions under which they are being held, particularly their
    medical care, the lack of running water and threats of violence against
    them
  • The fear of being forcibly resettled on Papua New Guinea where they
    believe they will be attacked by locals resentful of the imposition of a
    new population on their island.

During riots in the centre last year, Iranian asylum seeker Reza Barati was killed after local police and guards invaded the centre and attacked asylum seekers.


On Friday, Dutton alleged some refugee advocates in Australia, as
well as “a small number” of staff on Manus Island, were encouraging
detainees to go on hunger strike, to self-harm or disobey the orders of
staff.



“I very concerned that somehow people are conveying the message that
through noncompliant behaviour, through refusing to take food and water,
that that behaviour will change the outcome for those individuals in
terms of their desire to be settled in Australia. It will not.”





Manus Island detainee on stretcher

A detainee is carried out on a stretcher.



The minister did not present any examples or evidence. The allegation was rejected by detainees on the island.


“No one told [us] anything to do,” a detainee told Guardian Australia
from inside the detention centre. “We did it, and [are] keeping it
because this is our last way. We would like to show to everybody our
protest because we are victims.”



Another said: “Minister, why did he say like that? He needs to
encourage us to keep going? No problem. The boys they will never give
up, they said ‘grave or freedom’.”



Ian Rintoul from the Refugee Action Coalition, rejected the
minister’s allegation, and said the minister was ignoring the
“desperation and very real fears” of the asylum seekers on Manus.



“Typically, the government seeks to blame some unnamed minority for
the protests. But the asylum seekers are ‘coached’ by the brutality of
the government’s offshore processing policy,” Rintoul said.



Victoria Martin-Iverson from the Refugee Rights Action Network said
there was “zero evidence” that advocates had coached detainees, and said
the men on Manus had a right to speak publicly and to protest.



“These men have clearly said they are losing their mental health,
they are not safe to either return home or be forced to live in danger
on Manus ‘in the community’. Indeed they have been begging to be turned
over to the UN. They have lost faith that Australia will do the just or
decent thing.



“These men are asking for other solutions to be found. Does anyone
really believe that the government is genuinely concerned that they are
harming themselves?”



Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the protests were not encouraged, but the “human result of cruelty”.


“Refugees are suffering and I am worried that the minister’s harsh
response will only inflame the situation,” she said. “For the minister
to try and blame everyone else for the tragic situation is ridiculous
and cowardly.”