Where is the Outrage?
 Article by John Kelly
Excerpt from the Article:
Ever since that day back in 2001 when the Norwegian freighter Tampa
 rescued asylum seekers from drowning and John Howard refused permission
 for them to disembark at an Australian port, the political landscape 
for our country changed. Because we the people endorsed that decision, 
we must accept responsibility for everything that has happened since. 
That John Howard’s legacy will be tainted forever by this one 
opportunistic decision and be the defining measure of his time as prime 
minister is something for him to contemplate. That we the people have, 
subsequent to that decision, forced both the major political parties to 
quiver in their shoes every time the media highlights the issue is 
something for us to contemplate.
On Q&A last Monday night, Jamie Briggs, Assistant Minister for 
Infrastructure and Regional Development argued against his government’s 
culpability in the Manus Island murder of Reza Berati by reminding Labor
 Transport spokesperson, Anthony Albanese that 1000 asylum seekers 
perished at sea over the past 5 years. When a debate descends down this 
path one can see that the substance of the issue has been reduced to the
 level of its form. It now comes down to the question of who has been 
more successful in killing the least number of people seeking asylum in 
the race to stop the boats. Where is the outrage?
When we defend the charge of causing someone’s death with a counter 
charge that our accuser did the same thing, we should know that we have 
reached the bottom of the barrel in our moral and social understanding 
of rightness and wrongness

 
No comments:
Post a Comment